![]() ![]() Impact of nuclear weapons in view of the catastrophic humanitarian consequences At the same time, the issue of humanitarian Security policy including nuclear deterrence. Japan also urges the DPRK to return to the NPT and IAEA safeguardsĪnd credible and meaningful dialogue towards denuclearization.Īgainst the backdrop of an increasingly severe security environment our countryįaces, we reaffirm the necessity to continue to employ an appropriate national Nuclear programmes, and immediately cease all relatedĪctivities. Japan strongly urges theĭPRK to refrain from provocations, abandon all nuclear weapons and existing Is of grave concern to the whole international community. In this regard, the DPRK’s on-going nuclear and missile development programme We welcome the two agreements, the Joint Comprehensive Plan ofĪction between EU3+3 and Iran as well as the “Roadmap” between the IAEA and Proliferation issues through diplomatic dialogue is vital. Will bring them together under a cooperative framework with the aim ofĭeveloping and eventually applying new technologies and concepts to address Understanding about the complex challenges involved in verification of theĮntire life cycle of nuclear weapons. Nuclear- and non-nuclear-weapon States can work together to deepen their Especially, Japan regards the US initiative as an important platform where both Norway and US’ initiative on the International Partnership for Nuclearĭisarmament Verification (IPNDV). To maintain a moratorium on the production of fissile materials for nuclear States possessing nuclear warheads to seriously consider declaring or continue Until the entry into force of an FMCT, we urge all nuclear-weapon States and States to seriously consider creative ways to start an FMCT negotiation. Japan requests not only CD Member States, but all UN Member To increase momentum for the commencement of negotiations in the Conference onĭisarmament (CD). The report adopted by the FMCT GGE is expected Japan urges all countries, particularly, the remaining eight Annex II States to ratify the Treaty to overcome internalĭifficulties and manage to take prompt action. The Entry into Force of the CTBT” in New York last month and adopted a final declarationĬalling for the early entry into force of the CTBT. ![]() Japanese and Kazakhstan Foreign Ministers co-chaired “the Ninth Conference on Facilitating Of the CTBT and the early commencement of an FMCT remain an imminent issue. To the PrepComs, which will provide Member States an We look forward to seeing the detailed regular reports by the N5 Among other things, the continuation of reporting should be Nuclear- and non-nuclear-weapon States, which is imperative to uphold the NPT Welcomed and contribute to filling the gap of trust and confidence between Their voluntary actions will definitely be Nuclear-weapon States to take, on a voluntary basis, whichever disarmament Obligation of Article VI of the NPT and renew their commitments made in the We call upon all nuclear-weapon States to fulfill the Is valid and effective not only for confidence building among them but willĪlso serve as a basis for future multilateral negotiations among States possessing That the continuation of dialogue among the five nuclear-weapon States, or “N5 Process,” Other States that possess nuclear weapons. Reduction of nuclear arsenals, and eventual global nuclear stockpile reduction involving It as non-nuclear weapon states without delay and without conditions toĪnd US leadership based upon mutual trust is indispensable for further Importance of universality of the treaty and urge non-States Parties to accede to NPT faces serious challenges, it remains the most universal treaty to secure Plan of 2010 and other measures agreed to in the past Review Conferences inīearing this in mind, we would like to underscore the following What is most important to do is to carry out the Action The NPT regime, which has been a linchpin for international peace and security Now we should do whatever we can to strengthen Structure will gradually be unraveled and an overarching security architectureīased on the NPT will be wavered. We are afraid that the nuclear non-proliferation The same time, the absence of an agreement means that we lost the sense ofĭirection toward the 2020 Review Conference. Member States to take a united action towards a world free of nuclear weapons. A lack ofĪgreement at this time does not mean we have a shortage of political will among Overestimate nor underestimate the result of the Review Conference. The review cycle up to the 2020 Review Conference. Us with concrete guidelines for nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation for Unable to produce a consensus outcome document Unfortunately, the 2015 NPT Review Conference was Statemen t BY Toshio Sano Ambassador of Japan to the Conference onĪt The First Committee of the 70 th Session ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |